Israel picks the wrong side
We were delighted with the recent declaration of independence by the fledgling nation of Kosovo, and glad that the major European countries and the US lost little time in recognising it. The reactionary reaction from the Serbs was as predictable as it is contemptible (strange how all of a sudden Serbia is so interested in international law, isn’t it?), especially with recent announcements that display a certain childishness inappropriate to international discourse. The idea of a democratic pro-Western moderate Islamic European (says their declaration: “we believe our future lies with the European family”) country is a promising one to say the least.
One country, however, that has conspicuously failed to recognise Kosovo is another young state, whose declaration of independence was met with even worse threats and acts of violence: Israel. It is not hard to see why this might be from a political angle. Supporting Kosovo would alienate Russia, whom Israel has been trying to court as part of their bid to prevent Iran from becoming nuclear, though I personally don’t see that bearing fruit. Nor does it want to create a precedent whereby disputed peoples declare independence unilaterally, as the Palestinians have thought of doing in the past, while in the middle of peace negotiations - indeed, the comparison has been made.
This is the wrong attitude to take, for several reasons. For one thing, the above reasons are deeply flawed: Russia has never been a friend to Israel, and certainly isn’t on their side when it comes to Iran; and Abbas knows better than to declare independence not only when major powers will not recognise it, but when he has a willing partner in negotiations, which was not the case with Serbia. Rather, Israel should display camaraderie with its true friends, which includes Kosovo.
Hashim Thaçi, Kosovar prime minister, recently revealed the following to JTA: “I love Israel. What a great country. Kosovo is a friend of Israel. I met so many great leaders when I was there—Netanyahu, Sharon — I really admire them.” If nothing else, it seems exceedingly churlish and cynical for Israel to act in the way that it has.
But even from a political standpoint, a friendly Muslim state in SE Europe can hardly be a bad thing. Israel should not only be rushing to support such an effusive admirer, but should, along with Jews all over the world, be pouring investment into Kosovo to capitalise on this unique opportunity to improve Islamo-Jewish international relations. Kosovo has not forgotten Israel’s generosity, both in terms of aid and support during the crisis at the end of the last millennium, and nor should Jerusalem.
Israel would do well, as it approaches its 60th anniversary, to think back to the days of its own newly-declared independence. If Jews needed a Jewish state back then, how much more do they need a friendly Muslim one today?






Israel can’t back Kosovo because it sets a precedent for Palestine - at least, the sort of autonomy for Palestine that Israel would be uncomfortable with. Just as India has (as yet) not recognized Kosovo, despite its recognition of Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, which broke away from Morocco, because Kosovo reminds people of another K-word - Kashmir.
Obviously that is the main reason for Israel’s reticence, but it seems that I didn’t adequately explain why I don’t think it is true.
1. Kosovar-Serbian negotiations had broken down, prompting the unilateral declaration of independence. Israel and Palestine are involved in ongoing negotiations.
2. The Serbians were and are led by nationalists who flat-out refuse to conscience an independent Kosovo. Jerusalem has already stated its intention that a Palestinian state be established.
3. Kosovo has the support of the West, most significantly NATO. Palestine does not.
4. Abbas and Ahmed Qureia have already dismissed such talk for Palestine, citing the seriousness of the negotiations.
Even if there were some fear of encouraging the Palestinians to unilaterally declare independence, which I find highly unlikely, that factor would, in my opinion, be outweighed by the case for recognition.
You have neither live or worked in that area. So you can blow more smoke up someone else’s a**. And I would point out that even Canada has not recognised them either. We have our own issues with Quebec going on. As some one else pointed out, you can’t go recognising one country and ignore the other. There is a presidence.