Mandatory Intelligence Testing for Government Positions

U.S. Capitol Indisputably, any citizen of the United States would want politicians that accurately represented them and worked for the benefit of the nation. That said, the qualifications for office are, at best, adequate. Most of the requirements are reasonable standards. Each potential Congress member must be an American citizen for at least nine years and be a resident of the State they represent. Senators must be at least 30 years of age and representatives at least 25. The President must be a natural-born citizen and 35. However these are the only formal qualifications a candidate must have. This is why I suggest the addition of one more requirement: a mandatory IQ test result of at least 120 for every candidate for a governmental office.

At this point you may wonder, why on earth have candidates take IQ tests? Haven’t they proven themselves intelligent and motivated already by running for office? My reasoning is based on the assumption that the majority of the American population is intelligent and capable and therefore would be represented best by intelligent and capable politicians. However the truth of the matter is that quite a few political candidates, past and present, for any office, have substandard intelligence and have slipped through the cracks formed by the scant requirements. Two examples: Former President George H. W. Bush and current President George W. Bush. Daddy Bush has an IQ of 98 and our very own Dubya has an IQ of 91 (Lovenstein Institute Presidential IQ Study). An IQ score of 100 is considered average, with most likely professions being truck drivers, machine operators, farmers and carpenters. Bush Sr. was a Texas representative in 1966 and 1968 before being vice president to Ronald Reagan and then President. Bush Jr. was also a Texas representative, and became Governor of Texas in 1994. Obviously, a mandatory IQ test prior to campaigning would have saved America from the collective bad decision-making of the two Bushes, as neither of them would have made it to Congress at all.

Sure, most political candidates are smart and do their jobs well. Granted, the current requirements are logical and serve the purpose of providing the nation with good lawmakers and civil servants. Nevertheless, the addition of intelligence testing to the existing qualifications would reinforce the standard of politicians and lead to improved decision-making for the people’s benefit. Congress would not be stunted by any stupidity and would work more efficiently. Smarter politicians would also raise the rock-bottom public opinion of the government, and give the multitude of foreign countries that currently hate us, a more realistic impression of the American people. We can only benefit from such an addition, and although intelligence testing may not affect the majority of political candidates, it certainly would minimize the chances of ending up with a president who can’t pronounce the word nuclear.

4 Responses to “Mandatory Intelligence Testing for Government Positions”

  1. Danny
    April 13th, 2008 | 3:30 pm

    I entirely agree. Every President of America needs to be able to arrange squares in order. If only more people were able to spot the word out of place, then we truly would have improved decision making for the people’s benefit and would definitely raise the rock-bottom public opinion of the government.

  2. April 13th, 2008 | 10:37 pm

    Why stop at 120? That’s still not particularly clever. Why not just make everyone in the country take an IQ test, and whoever has the highest result is automatically the President? Oh, I know. Because it’s a democracy.

  3. Larry
    April 15th, 2008 | 9:36 pm

    “Two examples: Former President George H. W. Bush and current President George W. Bush. Daddy Bush has an IQ of 98 and our very own Dubya has an IQ of 91 (Lovenstein Institute Presidential IQ Study).”

    Lovenstein is a hoax:

    http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/hoaxes/presiq.htm

    No, this isn’t a real news report, nor does it describe a real study. There isn’t a “Lovenstein Institute” in Scranton, Pennsylvania (or anywhere else in the USA), nor do any of the people quoted in the story exist, because this is just another spoof that was taken too seriously.

    The article quoted above began circulating on the Internet during the summer of 2001. In furtherance of the hoax, later that year pranksters thought to register http://www.lovenstein.org and erecting a web site around it in an attempt to fool people into thinking there really was such an institute.

  4. April 27th, 2008 | 10:40 pm

    I’d disagree with the means; I believe there are serious issues with IQ testing as way of measuring intelligence.
    However I do agree with the general principle that politicians need to be intelligible and possess the *rare* talent of enunciation. How one acheives this is debatable - one would hope that democracy would aid, rather than hinder this process, but this clearly seems to not be the case.

Leave a reply